Sunday, November 27, 2016

The controversy of Federalism in Somalia

The controversy of Federalism in Somalia


It is the most talked subject in my country, it is the  curse of Somalia, it is a modern political system which started in the last few decades. It is a system which is applicable, a country of different ethnic groups, religions, cultures, languages and so on. But not applicable in a country with homogenous society such as Somalia.
What is that? It is none but federalism. Some thought that federalism would bring stability and development. Other people strongly believed that it will bring disunity, conflicts, lack of accountability, lack of patriotism and contested power.

Somali has been in civil war for the last quarter century.  -Every clan has it's own fighting factions that defend its own so-called dignity. -There is hatred between Somali brothers. More reconciliation is needed to reunite Somalis. But Somalia doesn't need a system that enhances their disunity.

Conflict is one of the major problems that accompanies federalism. Currently, there is on-going conflict between two states (Gal-mudug and Puntland) in the city of the two states-Galka'yo.  According to the BBC, this has led to the lose of lives of many, injured a large number of people and even those who dwell in Galka'yo have fled to outskirts of the city. Therefore, federalism seems not suited in Somalia.
Accountability is the most significant thing in states. Citizens need to see a transparent state so they can know wether sectors are riddled with corruption or not. Today the central government of Somalia has no power to see how the income from Kismayo port in Jubbaland state is managed.

These days the number of national patriotics are falling due to federalism. Because they have opted for regionalism over patriotism. For example, a person who lives in or is from Puntland is a Puntlander rather than Somali.
The centralization of power is weakened by both the former and newly built states. Every state has it's own administration with little or no intervention by the central government of Somalia. For example, the leaders of the states have the power to sign an agreement with foreign governments. Likewise, some states create anarchy in to the central government causing political instability in government institutions. In addition, they sometimes independently attempt to become a free government. All these are arguments from opposers.

Some argue that federalism is more democratic and will get rid of tyranny by a separation of power, justice and development in terms of economic and social life. They also say that the public will have a chance to criticize the government.


In conclusion, federalism is a new strange system of governance for a homogenous society threatened by civil war. Unfortunately, citizens are unable to restrict the spread of federalism that corrupts and undermines the value of Somalism.

                               Written by:- Mohamud Shawul Abdirahman
                                 E-mail:-      Mshawul114@gmail.com

No comments:

Post a Comment